I’m tired of writing about depressing things like the economy. It’s Friday night – let’s have some fun. So, without further ado, a detailed analysis of Heart’s “Alone.” (Lyrics in italics.)
I hear the ticking of the clock.
I’m lying here, the room’s pitch dark.
I wonder where you are tonight,
No answer on the telephone.
And the night goes by so very slow,
Oh, I hope that it won’t end up alone.
I don’t know if there is a power ballad with a more descriptive or powerful opening. It tells us so much. Our speaker clearly cannot sleep; she is hearing the ticking the clock and noting the darkness in the room. And we know this is after her booty call got no answer. Let’s not put too fine a filter on this; here is a chick who is looking to take a ride on the bone rollercoaster, couldn’t get her man on the phone, and it’s keeping her up. She’s likely hoping the phone will ring with a call back. She’s trying to figure out what to do if that doesn’t happen.
Till now, I always got by on my own
I never really cared until I met you.
And now it tears to the bone.
How do I get you alone?
How do I get you alone?
Now we get a little further insight into our speaker. She was a bit of a loner it would seem, until she met the object. But now she’s all worked up, and can’t figure out how to get the object alone, presumably without his clothing. This leaves us to wonder – is the speaker a younger woman speaking of her first love, or a older woman who is finally letting her guard down as she is overcome with emotion for the object.
You don’t know how long I have wanted
To touch your lips and hold you tight.
You don’t know how long I have waited
And I was going to tell you tonight.
So she waited a long time. That would lead one to believe the speaker and object had know each other a while, but only recently had things advanced to a point where they could fornicate. Perhaps this is an office friendship that always had that edge. Maybe the object had a long term girlfriend who was really hot but kinda stuck-up and mean, but they finally broke up because she wanted to get married on a Caribbean Island, but the object refused because he wanted his infirm great-grandmother to attend the wedding. And recently the speaker and the object went out for drinks after work, and they had a few too many, and then there was this awkward kiss, but nothing else happened, but they both wanted more to happen, but neither would say that at the time. So the speaker called over to the object’s apartment hoping to see if the object wanted to watch a movie, but clearly it was all about telling him how much she longed for him and then probably do it. But the bastard wasn’t home.
But secret is still my own,
And my love for you is still unknown.
Alone.
And here she is, alone.
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Till now, I always got by on my own
I never really cared until I met you.
And now it tears to the bone.
How do I get you alone?
How do I get you alone?
I think the scream just reinforces the sexual tension and frustration at being alone. Perhaps our speaker was not too experienced, or due to shyness and/or a weight issue is limited on her sexual partner options. And here she is, all worked up but with no man to share that with. She’s probably sleepy too but afraid to go asleep in case this object returns her call. But she knows that she has reached a time in the night that even if he does call, and they make small talk and she convinces him to come over, it’s going to be so late that even if they do get in the sack, they’ll probably just roll around a little and then fall asleep. In the end, she is no better off. So here she is, as she has always been, alone.
How do I get you alone?
How do I get you alone?
Alone…..
Alone…..
I’d suggest calling earlier. Or maybe even weaseling your way into some sort of quasi-date situation. Or ask him to come over to help you with some silly home improvement item. Be creative. In the end, it really shouldn’t be that hard to get a dude in bed with you if you are willing to toss the cat around.
I Just Don’t Know
February 20, 2009 by MikeEver have a circular argument with somebody? You know, the sort of thing where you are trying to solve 3 problems, and each solution solves 2 but makes the 3rd worse. Then you come up with another solution that solves the 3rd but makes 1 and 2 worse. That’s how I feel about this whole mortgage mess. I understand how we got here. I understand who is involved. But I for the life of me can’t figure out how to fix this thing. Consider the following:
Effect on…
Underwater Homeowners
Stable Homeowners
Banks/Mortgage Securities Holders
Non-Homeowners
Plan A: Do Nothing
Lose their home, bankruptcy, bad credit, years to recover
Home values drop significantly as foreclosures and shorts sales enter marketplace
Left with properties worth a fraction of original loan value. Mortgage bonds worthless; banks going to need more assistance.
Probably harmed by bank problems, but big winner if they have good credit and want to buy a home.
Plan B: Rework distressed mortgages via lower interest rates/longer maturity
Some homes may be saved. Risky behavior by some may be rewarded. Likely to see some foreclosures due to sour job market
Home values propped up some, which may be the only reward for spending within their means. Good behavior not rewarded.
Better than the do-nothing plan, but still holding properties or securities with lower values.
Screwed if looking for a home because the government is artificially inflating property prices from a foreclosure bottom.
Plan C: Purchase distressed mortgage securities from banks
Probably same as A: Lose their home, bankruptcy, bad credit, years to recover
Home values drop significantly as foreclosures and shorts sales enter marketplace
Best plan for these guys, as they can unload toxic assets from balance sheets.
Probably same as A minus the bank problems.
Those are the only three options I’ve heard. It’s kinda sad really. Nobody’s a winner, but there are many losers. And then there’s the question about what to do about the banks. This is the 3rd straight decade they have screwed our economy in the name of big bucks. In the 80s, it was the Savings & Loan Crisis. Seeking bigger returns, banks took incredible risks, knowing that FDIC insured all their deposits. In the 90s, it was derivatives. The moral of that story is that credit ratings can be bought and banks will do anything for the right fee. (Side note: If you want an inside look at how the large investment banks used to operate before this crisis, I highly recommend Frank Partnoy’s F.I.A.S.C.O. This book will show you how banks simply hire and pay really smart people to screw the less smart while making a ton of money. I don’t’ have a problem with this, per se, but it’s important to realize it happens.)
And then there’s the mortgage crisis of the 2008/2009. Mortgages were thought to be guaranteed by the Feds, money was cheap, and everybody was making money on mortgages. The way to make money was more, more, more. Don’t worry if the people have the income to pay this back – that’s so tomorrow, and if they don’t, the Feds will back us. It was thought that we can’t lose, and if we do, enough of us would lose so that the Federal government would bail out the banks. And they have, and continue too.
Again, I don’t know the answers here. I only know one thing. There is not-so-recent phenomenon in business called “Too Big to Fail.” Chrysler’s bailout in early 1980s might have been the first, but since then, we’ve seen Long Term Capital (a hedge fund), General Motors, and a litany of banks all receive government arranged and/or backed loans or cash because they are too big to fail. Too many people would lose their jobs. Too big a drag on our markets. This is a horrible president to set for our industries.
Consider this scenario: You are CEO of XYX Corp, a large company that employs over 100,000 workers and has hundreds of feeder companies that rely on your business. Your CFO comes to you with two growth strategies. The first one is wild, real outside the box stuff, and pretty risky. If you pull it off, you can grow revenue by over 50%. You’ll be hailed a business genius, complete with book deals, CNBC interviews, and a speaking tour. Bonus and equity deal will make you a multi-millionaire. You’ll be set for life. But if it fails…the whole company could be risk.
The second plan is boring, and focuses on sustainable revenue growth of 7-9%. It’s not risky, sort of funds itself, and really wouldn’t do much but make the shareholders nod appreciatively. But let’s face it, nobody’s gonna buy the book from the guy that grew revenue 7%, just like nobody’s gonna buy the golf book from the guys who always shoots 86.
Which do you pick? Well, under our current regime, I’m picking the first one. To hell with risk; if the plan bombs, then I’ll just go to Capitol Hill, hat in hand, and talk about how the government better bail us out or hundreds of thousands of jobs are gone. Whole communities will board up. Sure, I’ll probably have to resign, but my severance will keep a roof over my head. Probably a really nice roof. And, in a few years somebody will hire me, and the cycle will begin anew.
Tags: economic commentary, economy, mortgage crisis, mortgages, US economy
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »